|
PARSHAS LECH LECHA| 8 CHESHVAN 5768 | 20 OCTOBER 2007
| |
| |
|
| |
talking points - parshas lech lecha
| |
|
| |
Bris By: Rabbi Reuven DruckerDear Rabbi, Dana, However, there are legitimate medical reasons to postpone a Bris. A newborn’s constitution is delicate and the Torah does not want us to compromise his health. Our Sages have given us symptoms to look for in order to determine if the Bris is contraindicated on the eighth day. For example, if the baby ran a fever during the days leading up to the Bris, then we need to wait seven full days (168 hours) from the time the fever subsided. This could sometimes result in postponing the Bris for an additional week or more. Furthermore, if the baby’s complexion turns yellowish during the days preceding the Bris, we wait until the skin returns to its normal color. In some cases, the complexion does not return to its normal color for several days following the eighth day. When a Bris is postponed, there are some authorities who rule that if the day of the newborn’s recovery (from fever or jaundice, for example) falls on a Thursday or Friday, we postpone the Bris until Sunday, so that the newborn’s three-day recuperation will not take place during Shabbat. The reason is that some medical necessity may arise during the recuperation period, which will require us to break the laws of the Sabbath. Although putting aside the Shabbat laws for a legitimate medical concern is not only permissible, but even considered a mitzvah, we try to avoid such a possibility, when the scheduling is in our control. However, if the boy is born on a Thursday or Friday, and the eighth day for the Bris therefore falls on either a Thursday or Friday, we do not postpone the circumcision, since the Mitzvah requires a Bris on the eighth day, and the scheduling is based on Torah law and is not in our control. So, in answer to your question, Dana, you will find that many postponed circumcisions take place on Sunday for the above consideration. However, one may only postpone a Bris for a bona fide medical problem. Many times, the Mohel (who is the individual who performs the circumcision procedure) will consult with a Rabbinic authority in order to determine whether the Bris should take place on the eighth day. (Parenthetically, I might add that a Rabbinic authority oftentimes consults with a pediatrician in order to understand how current medical opinion views the condition the newborn presents. In conjunction with the Rabbinic literature, the Rabbi will render his ruling.) In the absence of medical consideration, the Bris should not be postponed. In fact, it should be scheduled before mid-day on the eighth day, if possible, in order to demonstrate one’s eagerness to perform the Mitzvah. Regrettably, we sometimes hear of individuals who postpone the Bris to a Sunday in order that more family and relatives can attend. Such a decision, however, is not in conformity with Torah principles. I hope you are granted the opportunity to make a Bris in your family, Dana, and raise boys and girls who cling to our Torah.
Rabbi Drucker can be reached at rabbidrucker@partnersintorah.org | |
|
| |
|
Rambam (Maimonides), in his Hilchos Teshuvah (10:2), discusses the lofty level of Avraham's Divine service: "One who serves Hashem out of love will busy himself with the study of Torah and the performance of mitzvos (commandments) not due to any external consideration, neither for fear of punishment nor in order to receive reward. Rather, he does what is true simply because it is truth; and the reward will come as a result. This is a very lofty level, and not every wise man is able to achieve it. This is the level attained by our Patriarch Abraham, whom Hashem called `My beloved one,' for he served Hashem only out of love. And this is the level that Hashem commanded each of us through Moshe Rabbeinu (Moses) to try to achieve, as the verse states (Devarim 6:2): And you shall love Hashem, your God. When one reaches the proper level of love for Hashem, he will immediately perform all of the mitzvos out of love." We see that Rambam defines the basis of service out of love (avodah mei'ahavah) as ``doing what is true because it is the truth." R' Shlomo Wolbe, in his Alei Shur, notes that this is also what we call performing a mitzvah lishmah, ``for its own sake." But the question arises: Why is it necessary for one to perform every mitzvah solely because it is the truth? As long as he knows that it is the truth, why does the fact that he has a secondary motive detract from the performance of the mitzvah? To understand this, R' Wolbe directs us to a statement of Rambam in Sefer HaMitzvos (§3):`` . . . we are commanded to love Hashem. This means that we must contemplate and ponder His commandments, His statements and His deeds, until we understand them and we derive the greatest possible enjoyment from this understanding — this is the love that we are required to achieve." From this we see that love of Hashem is based on true understanding of His ways, which can be reached only through delving into His words and deeds. And only when one has reached the level of the greatest possible enjoyment from his understanding has he attained the level of loving Hashem. If his understanding does not afford him joy, he has not reached love of Hashem! Thus, one who performs the mitzvos knowing they are the truth, but also has secondary motives, cannot be said to love Hashem, for he has not reached the level of ultimate enjoyment. If he had, there would be no room in his performance for any ulterior motives. One who serves out of true love for Hashem does so for this reason alone, and no other. return to top | |
|
| |
Hey, I never knew that! By Ozer AlportAmazing Insights About the Weekly ParshaQ:As Abraham and Sarah approached Egypt, Abraham asked Sarah to pretend to be his sister so that the Egyptians will give him presents on account of her (12:13). Why was Abraham, who later refused to accept even the smallest gift from the king of Sodom, so interested in receiving gifts from the Egyptians?A: There was once a man who fell into difficult financial straits. Unable to pay for even his most basic necessities, he had no choice but to begin accepting loans. Unfortunately, his situation didn’t improve and his debts continued to accrue. Recognizing his desire to pay off his debts and his frustration over lacking the means to do so, a friend offered to pay off the loans for him as a present. The man was very appreciative of his friend’s generosity, but felt uncomfortable accepting financial gifts of such magnitude. Though his friend encouraged him to reconsider, he remained obstinate in his position, justifying his decision with the verse in Proverbs (15:27) “one who hates gifts will live.” With neither friend willing to budge, they agreed to present their “dispute” to a Rabbi for resolution. After hearing the two sides, Rav Yitzchok Zilberstein ruled that the debtor is obligated to accept the gift. He supported his ruling as follows. After leaving Egypt to return to Canaan, the Torah relates (13:3) that Abraham traveled on the same path which he had taken on his way down. Rashi explains that he stayed in the same inns in which he had lodged on his way to Egypt. As he had lacked the means to pay for his accommodations, he was forced to stay in lodging which extended him a line of credit. On his way back home, he was careful to stop at each of these inns to pay the bills he had accumulated. We can now understand that as Abraham approached Egypt in a time of famine, he feared that on his return journey he would be no better off than before and would have no means to pay off his creditors. As much as he was loathe to accept gifts, he was even more uncomfortable remaining a debtor to people who had been kind enough to help him in his time of need. Out of desperation, he hatched a plan to claim that Sarah was his sister so that the Egyptians would shower him with gifts, thereby allowing him to repay his debts. We see from Abraham that it is indeed appropriate for a person facing financial hardship to accept gifts in order to pay off the debts he has accrued! Q: The Talmud (Berachos 7b) derives from 15:8 that Abraham was the first person in history to call Hashem אדון – Master. Which practices that we observe are based on this historical fact? A:The author of a new commentary on the Siddur (prayer-book) brought his manuscript to the great Vilna Gaon to receive his comments and request a letter of approbation. The Gaon began to examine the work and noticed that the author suggested an original insight explaining why the morning prayers begin with Adon Olam (Master of the World). The Talmud (Berachos 26b) teaches that each of the forefathers instituted one of the three daily prayers: Abraham enacted Shacharis, Isaac originated Mincha, and Jacob introduced Maariv. As the morning prayers were instituted by Abraham, who was the first person to refer to Hashem as Adon, we therefore begin Shacharis with Adon Olam. Upon reading this, the Gaon was overcome with joy and remarked that if only for the beauty and truth of this one insight, the publication of the entire work is justified! In a similar vein, the Meshech Chochmah by Rabbi Meir Simcha of Devinsk explains why we are accustomed to wear a Tallis and Tefillin only during the morning prayers, even though both commandments are applicable all day. After miraculously defeating the armies of the four kings, Abraham brought back all of the people and possessions which had been taken captive. The King of Sodom suggested that Abraham return to him the people while keeping the possessions for himself. Lest the wicked king of Sodom take credit for making him rich, Abraham refused to accept any gifts, emphatically swearing (14:23) that he wouldn’t accept even a thread or a shoestrap. The Talmud (Sotah 17a) teaches that in the merit of this statement, Abraham’s descendants received the mitzvos of Tallis and Tefillin. Although they may be worn the entire day, because we merited receiving them through the actions of Abraham, we are accustomed to commemorate this by wearing them only during Shacharis, the morning prayers! return to top Ozer Alport can be reached at ozer@partnersintorah.org Table Talk: For discussion around the Shabbos Table א) In commanding Abraham to leave his homeland, Hashem promised him that in his new location he would merit to have children and become a great nation, would become wealthy, and would become well-known and respected (12:1-2). Why is leaving his homeland considered one of the ten tests of faith to which Hashem submitted Abraham (Avos 5:3) if he was promised such great reward for doing so? (Panim Yafos by Rabbi Pinchas Horowitz, Darkei Mussar by Rabbi Yaakov Neiman, Darash Moshe Vol. 2 by Rabbi Moshe Feinstein) | |
|
|
Parsha Partner is a publication of Partners In Torah Partners in Torah is a multi-faceted educational organization dedicated to fostering unity among jews of all backgrounds and assisting them in their quest for a deeper appreciation of their heritage. Partners in Torah brings adults from across the spectrum of religious observance together for a variety of study programs and jewish life experiences. Our growing participant base of 12,000+ is serviced by 24 trained professionals who work to maximize the experience of each participant. Honor or remember a loved one by dedicating an issue of parsha partner which reaches over 15,000 people each week. dedications (up to 15 words) for yahrtzeits, refuah sheleyma, etc. are $180 and issue. for dedication and free subscriptions information or to have a parsha partner sent to your shul, call 732-363-3330 ext. 6377, or via e-mail parsha@partnersintorah.org |
|
In memory: Yehuda Arieh ben Yehoshua Gross - 4th Yahrzeit, 7 MarCheshavan. Beloved father of Judy Citer. | |